Adult Attachment Interview Review
John Bowlby, the psychoanalyst that
originated the attachment theory, proposed that human motivation is organized by
innate behavioral systems that facilitate adjustment and survival. He also
explained the infant-mother bond in terms of the need for protection, security,
and affection. He also paid considerable attention to the child-parent
interactions and the ways in which early experiences influence adult behavior
and expectations. Attachment is defined as an enduring emotional tie with a
specific other. Attachment systems extend throughout the life span and is
indicated by adult’s capability to become emotionally attached to a close
relationship partner, using them as a source of love, support, and
encouragement. A child or adult who feels threatened and inadequately protected
or supported has a difficult time directing attention to play, curiously exploring
objects and environments, and establishing mutually rewarding relationships
with others. Over time these issues can interfere with self-development (Mikulincer
& Shaver, 2013).
When learning about the Adult
Attachment Interview in Human Growth and Development class, I found it very
interesting. We were able to perform a piece of the interview with a peer to
get a feel for the test instrument. We were to ask our peer to describe their childhood
relationship with their mother and then their father in four (normally five)
adjectives. It was a great experience to see how others responded to the
question and then being put in the same situation yourself. In the class
discussion we talked about what we gained from the exercise. We all agreed that
it was easy to come up with the adjectives, but when it came down to giving a
specific story to support the adjective it took a little more time to think
about. The words you choose and the stories you told are not really the focus
when coding the AAI and I found that to be very interesting. It is more about
how you answer, what you say, and your reactions. The classifications of the
AAI are secure autonomous, preoccupied, dismissive, and unresolved for loss or
abuse. By your reaction and what you say you are classified as one of the
categories. While listening to my peers give their story for the adjective I was
able to get a feel for their tone, see the look of joy or sadness on their
face, and tell if what they were saying was sincere.
If you are considered secure
autonomous people would have a consistent story that is of quality, quantity, relevance,
and order. Dismissive would be brief,
have notable contradictions, generalized representations, and consist of
idealism. Preoccupied transcripts would be long, have unfinished sentences, vague
expression, and often sound confused. Unresolved
adults would have stories that center around traumatic events such as loss or
abuse. Sometime unresolved adults will talk about a dead person as if they are
still alive and consist of prolonged silence or trance-like state of speaking.
I was able to pick up on the fact
that how the person told the story had a great deal of meaning before we even discussed
it in class and by seeing how the transcripts would be recorded shows signs
that could be pick up on, making it very obvious as to why I believed so. I
also believe that your attachment style with your parent affects your attachment
as an adult to other people such as your significant other. Several studies have shown that
higher scores on measures of attachment anxiety and avoidance are associated
with lower scores on measures of sensitive and responsive caregiving to a
romantic partner (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2013).
I believe that adult attachment emphasizes
how much of an impact early life can have on us later in life and that those experiences
help shape us. I find comfort in knowing that even though a person may not be
of the secure attachment type that it is possible that they can work towards
becoming secure. There is hope!
References
Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. (2013).
Adult attachment orientation and relationship process. Journal of Family Theory & Review 4. 259-274.
Great post Cerria! You are correct, based on the result of my AAI, it is easy for me to give an adjective that describes my father but when it came down to giving a specific story to support the adjective it took a little more time for me to think about it. This is mainly because my father has authoritarian parenting style and I cannot say that I had a good relationship with him when I was younger. And I noticed that this affected my relationship to other people. But through the years, I have tried to work my relationship with my father and saw a huge improvement with him and between our relationship as father and son. You are right, there is hope! As my relationship with my father improves, it also reflects to my relationships with my close friends and family.
ReplyDeleteCierra,
ReplyDeleteI am so glad to hear you enjoyed the AAI demonstration.
My favorite aspect of this research is what you mentioned in the last paragraph of your post and that is that research in this area shows that there is a classification called "Earned Secure" this is where loving scores from the mother or father are below a 3.
In these situations where a person despite having this kind of unloving childhood is still able to tell a coherent story and aknowledge the good and bad without trying to take back the bad or explain it away and is still able to value relationships and attachment... these individuals are called Earned secure.
Some researchers are interested in determining these pathways to earned security.
It is an area that provides much hope.
Blessings,
Dr. K